24/10/2015
A new, rising-cult/dogma that is misguiding Muslims over the net here is Nouman Ali Khan's refutation of them:
"These rifts are also [0:09], they cut apart what Allah commands to keep combined. [0:16] and by the way what Allah commands to keep combined, [0:19] a very beautiful commentary because Allah is including the discussion of hypocrites here, he said something very subtle and powerful. One of the movements within hypocrisy even at the time of the prophet [0:31], do you know what it was? It was to separate the Quran from the messenger, the Quran from the sender. There was a movement within the hypocrites even at the time of [0:44] when he would commend them to do something they would say is it in the Quran? If it’s not in the Quran I don’t have to listen, they would say that to his face. These were the [0:51] they’re talked about in that regarding [0:53], right? So Allah has commanded the two things be together, what are those two things; his word and his messenger [1:01], they go hand in hand but the [1:07] wants to separate those two. So once you separate those two you can interpret the book however you want because you’re not caged by the model practice of the [1:17], you’re not caged by that, you can interpret it however you will, it becomes entirely subjective and by the way that ancient movement of hypocrisy is still alive today, it’s still alive today, the attempts to cut apart the book of Allah from the messenger of Allah, to make them two separate things and they do it in different ways, some would say oh his job was just to deliver the message, everything else is his personal business, kind of like now it is you have FedEx UPS service, their job is to deliver the package nothing else, you don’t thank the guy who delivered it, you sign the paper and move on, this is the role of the messenger. Other say no, he is a messenger and what he did is great, these are wonderful things, obviously Allah would pick a great man to be a messenger [1:57] but that doesn’t mean we have to follow him, it just means he’s nice. So it’s a great thing that he did those wonderful things but we’re only obligated to only follow Allah’s book. These ideas, by the way are nothing but a contradiction, an attack against the Quran itself, this is not even an attack on the [2:16], this is an attack on the Quran. If people genuinely study the Quran there is room to make such claims. There is no room whatsoever. I know I went on a tangent but this was an important tangent to discuss, [[2:31], they cut apart what Allah has commanded to keep joined [2:37] and thereby what do they do? They cause corruption in the land. [2:43], now when they cause corruption in the land obviously other people suffer, whenever you do corruption it’s not just that you’re doing something has repercussions on you, more than anything else it has repercussions on others but in the end Allah says even though you think they’re harming others [3:03] they themselves are the ones in loss, they themselves are the losers, the harm they cause others is nothing compared to the harm they’re causing actually to themselves."
http://transcriptlegacy.com/quranists-destroyed.html